Trustees Say Yes to Water Bill Credits, Long-Term Solution for Boulder Hill Rust Issues
Residents dealing with rust issues since November will receive a $75 water bill credit, and the village will explore spending an estimated $7.8 million to replace and loop pipes beneath Boulder Hill.
Note: A map of the area that will receive water bill credits and see construction on the water system is attached to this article.
Montgomery trustees on Wednesday agreed to offer water bill credits to residents of Boulder Hill dealing with rusty water issues, and took the first steps toward a long-term solution to the problem.
That solution, according to Village Engineer Pete Wallers, will involve replacing and/or looping about 20,000 feet of water main beneath the unincorporated area, at a preliminary estimated cost of about $7.8 million. This would update the older, cast-iron mains beneath three specific areas of Boulder Hill, or roughly 12.5 percent of the full system.
Those areas were chosen based on the homes affected by the recent rust problems, which began in November when one of the village’s wells – Well #14, on the west side – went offline. The well was fixed in January, but village staff had to take the main water treatment plant on Knell Road offline that month as well, when residents began reporting a petroleum smell in their water.
Village staff had to start pumping water to Boulder Hill from other wells, and the change in direction shook loose rust deposits that had built up in the pipes. Both Wallers and Public Works Director Mike Pubentz confirmed that the water leaving the village’s treatment facilities is essentially iron-free, so the problem, they say, is in the pipes.
At Wednesday’s Committee of the Whole meeting, Wallers presented a preliminary analysis of the areas of concern, broken down into three groups: dead-end water mains that need looping, two-inch water mains that need expanding, and mains that need to be replaced.
All together, he identified 30 different sections of main that would need work. Each of these, he said, would offer different challenges, given the small amount of space between homes, the need to work around utilities, and the difficulty in obtaining easements.
Wallers said the entire project could be completed by 2014, if the village takes out bonds or acquires a low-interest loan from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. That would require raising water rates in Boulder Hill to pay down that debt, he said, to the tune of about $2.50 per 1,000 gallons used.
That means a household that uses 10,000 gallons of water in a two-month period would pay about $13 more per month.
“No one wants to pay higher water rates,” Wallers said, “but it’s something we seriously have to consider if we want to once and for all solve the problem.”
Boulder Hill residents have been paying more for water service since the village took over the system – this year they will pay $6.03 per 1,000 gallons, while Montgomery residents will pay $4.90 – because, Wallers said, the operational cost of Boulder Hill water is more. This includes the frequent water main breaks in Boulder Hill – sometimes two to three times the number of breaks in Montgomery.
Trustee Bill Keck blamed poor workmanship in the original installation of the pipes beneath Boulder Hill. He said the village has been applying temporary solutions long enough, and agreed it’s time for a long-term one.
“There are no band-aids that are going to fix this situation,” he said. “We’re past the band-aid stage.”
Trustees agreed to incorporate the Boulder Hill project into the next water rate study, included in the Fiscal Year 2013 budget. Wallers said he would investigate the situation further and provide more exact estimates.
Four out of the six trustees then agreed to offer Boulder Hill residents in those areas a “goodwill gesture” credit of $75 on their water bills. Pubentz provided a map showing each home that had complained of rusty water since November, and he determined the affected area from that, estimating the total number of affected homes at 249.
At $75 each, Pubentz said, the credit will cost the village $18,675.
Trustees Matt Brolley and Stan Bond voiced their dissent, saying the money that would go to the credits should be rolled into the long-term fix for Boulder Hill. Brolley pointed out there are likely others in Boulder Hill and Montgomery with similar problems who have not complained, and added that the residents of Boulder Hill are still experiencing issues.
“To wave the victory flag and give a credit when the problem isn’t fixed seems backward,” he said.
Finance Director Jeff Zoephel said he is not sure whether the $75 credit can be arranged in time for the April 1 water bills. If not, he said, they will appear on the June 1 bills. Village Manager Anne Marie Gaura said she is not certain what the impact on the water fund will be.
Trustees will continue discussing the Boulder Hill water system at next month’s Committee of the Whole meeting.
Anonymous
9:07 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012
I'd like to know where they consider the "area" affected to be. I've had problems, just haven't complained because, frankly, I knew there's nothing they could do. I just spent an hour scrubbing my tub back to white yesterday! Shower curtains? Please! So, I'd really like a map of the "area."
Derick
9:08 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012
I own a home in boulder hill and currently still having this rust problem. I've spent money on shower curtains, cleaning supplies, and purchased bottled water since this problem occurred. Is this morally right to only give back a $75 credit? Then you have village members mentioning, "just put the credit money towards the $7.8 million re piping.". Oh yeah they want to increase the water bill to offset the $7.8 million. Really? I'm in the military and getting ready to transition back to the west coast. My family is staying here and they will have to continue putting up with this problem. I will say two more things... One, I know this water is not safe to drink (I've taken samples) and two, has anyone thought about filing a lawsuit? I have and will with time!
Greg Nelson
1:14 pm on Thursday, March 15, 2012
The only error was offering below market rated water to Boulder Hill without forcing cost (true cost) of distribution over the years. The Village has now taken steps to correct that and Boulder Hill Residents will now be forced to tow the line on the true cost. Remember Village Residents pay taxes to the Village and Boulder Hill doesn't so you'll now be required to share the full cost associated. Is it a jolt to you system, yes but it is what it is. Now for causing rust it is not the water being sent into the homes but the pipes that the developer placed which was approved by the County inspectors. The Village was not consulted on this an that fully points to KENDALL County. So fire away at the County they have taken your money for years and what do you get in return....not much!
Jim Sullivan
11:37 am on Sunday, March 18, 2012
Jim Sullivan
I beg to differ on Greg Nelson's statement. Boulder Hill with it's thousands of residents has been subsidizing Montgomery's water costs for over 45 years. We have paid double the Montgomery residents costs and they enjoyed cheap water for decades. If Boulder Hill didn't join the Montgomery water system in 1955 you people in Montgomery would have been on one well because that's all your water costs would have supporrted. The explosion in growth of Montgomery during the building boom overloaded the system. True the pipes in Boulder Hill were crap - they were installed by Don Dice the developer. But remmeber Montgomery and Kendall County with it's board of "farmers" both signed off on his shoddy practices. It's time for Montgomery to also catch up with reality and pay their fair share.