Montgomery Sam's Club Proposal Nearing a Vote
Warehouse chain in negotiations to locate in Ogden Hill retail development.
Montgomery could be home to a Sam’s Club warehouse store as early as next fall if the Village Board approves the development at its next meeting.
The store will be located on the western edge of the Ogden Hill retail development that also houses JC Penny and Menards, according to village documents. The village’s Plan Commission approved several variance recommendations this week.
The Village Board’s Committee of the Whole will hear those plans and their variances at its meeting set for Tuesday. The development is likely to come before the Village Board for a vote Feb. 25.
Plans for the store also include a tire center and gas station. The store is projected to bring in as much as $750,000 per year in sales tax to the village, and will mean about 170 new jobs, according to acting Village Manager Jeff Zoephel.
Zoephel also said the village is in negotiations with Sam’s regarding an economic incentive package that could involve sales tax rebates back to the company.
“Nothing has been decided on that yet,” Zoephel said.
Charlene Coulombe-Fiore, executive director of the Montgomery Economic Development Corp., called the proposal a big win for the entire area, including several other local taxing bodies that will benefit from additional tax dollars.
“This has been in the works for over a year,” Coulombe-Fiore said. “I know that Aurora, North Aurora and Oswego all were going after this development. I’m glad they are coming here.”
Dani
2:56 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I SOOOO wish this was Costco instead.
Neil Johnson
4:05 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
ABSOLUTELY! Maybe they can move to the spot Lowe's vacated.
Marlene Wyld
8:22 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Me too!!
Sally Jamieson
3:04 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Great, no more having to go down to rte 59. Wish it was going in the old Lowe's in Oswego, though.
Ryan B
3:05 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Pretty sure there's a an empty store front down the road (Lowe's) that could accomodate a Sam's Club with minimal construction costs. Paging Oswego economic development department...
Bridget Chochole
3:14 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I agree they should use lowes if they come but I'm not looking forward to all the traffic it would bring with it!!!
Kari Reiseck
3:36 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Soo funny before I read comments I was thinking... Couldn't this go in the old lowes? Guess we are all thinking this??? Why isn't the city?
David Zamora
4:17 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Lowes is in Oswego, this will be good for the area, but Montgomery will benefit from the tax revenue.
Linda L F
7:40 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
As a Montgomery resident, I'd love it if Montgomery got the tax benefit.
betsy k
7:50 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
And as an Oswego resident, we TOO would like he tax benefit AND there is a building just sitting!! What a waste!
Julie kiser
6:22 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Sorry Montgomery. I understand you want the revenue, but I am concerned about the traffic that will be amassing at that intersection. Former Lowes location would better.
Logansdad
8:43 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
As an Oswego resident, I am glad the location is not the former Lowe's space. Traffic on that stretch of 34 is already a nightmare.
Babs
2:44 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Rt. 30 will soon be a 4 lane highway. Traffic will be better. Oswego has all the big stores on Rt. 34. Oswego traffic is really busy around the shopping area. Slow moving traffic.
Montgomery deserves new business.
Steve Jungermann
6:27 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
As a resident and member of the plan commission for Montgomery, I'm thrilled Sam's is coming to Montgomery. The old Lowe's location in Oswego can stay just that. An old Lowe's location. It's time for the residents of Montgomery to be concerned with the economic development of Montgomery and not spend our hard earned dollars in other municipalities.
Pat Stiles
7:21 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I agree, also that intersection is already designed to handle traffic. Good job Steve
Heidi R
9:33 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I agree. Love that new businesses are coming to Montgomery!
mike ellison
12:12 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
How appropriate considering the village of Montgomery is reaming BH residents for replacing water lines that should have been paid for years ago with double the water rates. I can see where the lack of integrity comes from. Hopefully Oswego will get Lowes instead. Montgomery doesn't deserve it. How are those SSAs coming along genius?
Leah Angelakos
6:54 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Living close to that area, I'm not 100% on board with this. That's great that Montgomery will have economic development, but we are the ones that will have to deal with the extra traffic and the eye soar of seeing yet another huge store on a once vacant piece of land.
Ruby R.
7:45 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
THRILLED with this news! I am tired of driving to 59 to shop. About time!
Smokingdiesel
9:39 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Montgomery can have Sams, I wish Oswego would beg Costco to move into the old lowes bulding, Costco would draw all the business, now Oswego needs to focus on how to get a Trader Joes, then this area would be complete!
Marlene Wyld
8:29 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
No, the area won't be complete Smokingdiesel. Oswego still needs a Borders or another big book store. The closest big book store is on Rt. 59 or in downtown Naperville.
April Nowak
11:10 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I like your thinking. Trader Joes is really needed in this area.
GailR
7:27 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
I am so on board with your comment - Costco and Trader Joes would be wonderful and I think they'd be well supported.
Walt Hines
9:45 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
From everything I've heard from work this past month looks as though a fitness center might be taking the Lowes old spot. While it would be nice to have a Sam's or Costco move in it's too small for either. The parking lot alone couldn't handle the traffic and there's no where for a gas station which they all have, the 2 go together.
Great to see Sam's come! It will bring people from Yorkville, Sandwich and the surrounding areas who will all hopefully patronize the stores in Oswego along the
way. We need revenue to help with our taxes!
People should have lived here when you had to drive under the old bridge and if it flooded( happened often) you had to drive all over kingdom come to get back on 34. Not to forget that it was also a 2 line road that sometimes had Wackerlin's cows crossing it. That was something to complain about.
Oswegosmarts
8:33 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Walt I do remember those days. I think the building and lot is suitable, but I know as well as you that Oswego has no plans for anything. They just make it up as they go and hope for the best. Oswego lacks leadership, to do what is good for the taxpayers. Look at the Firehouse Pizza place nightmare that they created. We are one of the Highest taxing counties in the country and our state is in shambles. Who wants to open a business in an area that has one of the highest forclosure rates in the state. I also understand that State Farm Ins. is moving out of Il and to Texas. Think we were better off with the flooded bridge and waiting on the cows.
Jane Enviere
10:30 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Yay! I don't have any desire to drive down to 59 for Sam's or Costco, but if it's by someplace we already shop, that would be great! We would definitely shop there!
Charles Jamieson
6:42 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Does Oswego have an economic development department? Where were they on this? There aren't going to be many opportunities to fill a vacant store the size of former Lowe's and this one appears to be passing Oswego by. I wonder how hard Oswego tried to get this...if at all. I'll also agree with the other comments, given the choice, I'd take Costco over Sam's any day but I've not heard any serious Costco rumors for Oswego. Have you?
onetiredpuppy
7:31 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I am positive that the owners from Sam's considered the Lowe's spot. After all, Sam's and Walmart are owned by the same people and that would put them next to each other as they would probably prefer, like it is at Fox Valley. Clearly, the Location at Lowe's doesn't offer the particular necessities needed as mentioned above by Mr. Hines.
While they would need the gas station, it would not be a complete necessity as Walmart already has one. At Fox Valley there is one for both stores. Plus you can't add another gas station between Walmart and Meyers, can you?
Just sayin'
Ruby R.
10:11 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Speaking of gas stations, does anyone know why the Montgomery Wal-Mart on Orchard doesn't have a gas station? I have often wished there was a more competitively priced station on that stretch of Orchard.
Walt Hines
11:14 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
The Walmart on 59 next to Sam's is closing. They are moving to the east of Costco on 75th street ( the otherside of fitness club ). I saw the plans and it will be in keeping with the nicer store fronts along that path. Naperville does a great job of bringing in business, it's time that this town takes action fast before we sink the ship.
If you look at where most Sam's or Costco's are located you will see a pattern of being next to major intersections, Lowe's is far from that. Lowes doesn't have enough parking and there would be major traffic concerns, this is hurting the site. Once Sam's opens in Montgomery you will see the volume of vehicles that are
there on a daily basis.
These companies look long and hard for ideal locations and Lowe's has nothing going for it, sorry to say.
Dave B
9:30 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
sounds to me like people want it in the old lowes spot.
Jennifer
9:49 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I am in agreeance with many here; use the Lowes Building. If Sams moves in I Hope for 2 things: 1) construction for more traffic lanes will be added before they build Sams; 2) Sams Club and Montgomery Economic Development come to the table and state that Sam's Club MUST PAY A LIVING WAGE. SAMS MUST START AT AN HOURLY WAGE OF $12/HR.
Hopefully Oswego Econ & Dev is opening up discussions with Costco and get them in the Lowes Building?
Amy Miller Jackson
10:09 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
The old Lowes building is suited for only one thing...a Lowes! Do you really thing another big company is going to change a blueprint they already have to make a building like that work for what they already have mastered. Blueprints are not cheap. If I hear another comment about a book store for Oswego I am going to hurl. Would it be nice? Sure. Will it happen? Never. Amazon and other online sites destroyed bookstores. Go get a Kindle. We just hired an EDD in Oswego, he doesnt move that quick. If Trader Joes wanted to be here they would be already.
Michael Z.
1:18 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
lowes needs to become a costco please
lonsgirl
1:59 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I would like a Trader Joe's in Oswego so we don't have to travel to downtown Naperville area.
Maribeth Uhlenhopp
4:20 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
We moved from Naperville to Yorkville. If you want those businesses to come out here, you need to get on their websites and TELL them! Trader Joe's, PotBelly's, etc. all have new business development sections on their websites. Be specific...tell them about an intersection & why it will benefit them. Get on their radar!
And forget big chain bookstores. Why don't we lobby Anderson's to open a quality mom & pop independent bookstore out here? They have a tremendous reputation and bring fantastic authors out for book signings.
Mel
9:09 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
We have a book store in the area and the prices are amazing...Called the library!! Bookstores are a thing of the past thanks to technology. We will all keep those lovely memories of the past about the big bookstores.
Oswego Baseball Mom
4:52 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Most big bookstore chains are all going out of business because of all the electronic book options and even the smaller bookstores are struggling for survival and would not be expanding at this time. I too would love it if there was a bookstore in the area but that just isn't going to happen. I'm also not crazy about the traffic that would be brought here by either a Sam's or Costco. It's really not that difficult to drive 10 min to the current locations.
Sally Jamieson
6:29 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
It takes a lot longer than 10 minutes to drive to Sam's on Rte 59 from Oswego. I will be glad to have a Sam's that is a lot closer.
Walt Hines
7:47 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Bring the traffic, bring the stores and help bring our taxes down. With the overcrowding of schools and the inability of opening either additions without additional revenue I welcome any and all forms of money this town can get. They didn't turn 34 into 4 lanes for nothing. Can't wait for April when we can vote for new candidates that will allow businesses to come in. I've had my fill of flipping the bill for schools and all the rest. Let someone or something else pick up the tab!
CAB
9:01 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
I believe studies were done with collaborative thinkers to make a wise decision on where the Sams Club should go. Yes - The old Lowes building was considered for the SC, however (I believe) a traffic study proved results that the Montgomery location was BEST.
TLC Carpet Floors and More, Inc.
8:16 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
More minium wage jobs, w/ poor benitits oh great just what we need. Personally I dont shop at wall world, or sambos. No thanks.I dont care where they build, and why should any town give them any tax deals, either build here or dont. It would be better for ALL tax payers if towns didn't get bribed into tax deals. How come its OK to bribe a town for business favors.Let me know how that works on your next ticket.
Mel
2:21 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
My inside sources have told me that Sams looked into the Lowes building and that they want too much money for it. Less money for Sams to build what they want instead of paying out so much for the existing building. Even though Sams is going to Montgomery, Oswego Fire Protection District will receive the tax benefits for their services to them. So Oswego doesn't lose out completely in the deal.
Charlene Coulombe
10:40 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
The school district in Oswego as well.... will benefit from this project. So again, another win-win for both communities!
Michele Brown, Village of Oswego
1:53 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
In early 2012, Sam’s had a contract to purchase the Lowe’s site for approximately 6 months. During this time period, Lowe’s real estate personnel did not entertain any offers or actively market the site. The site decision involved an internal Wal-Mart debate relating to the final selection. The Lowe’s site was much less costly to retrofit when compared to a new store construction. However, the deciding factor was apparently the desire to construct a “prototype” store that could be designed on the vacant Montgomery site, and the higher traffic counts at the Route 30/34 intersection were also a major factor. Village Staff had been in contact with Costco and other big box retailers for the space, however none were interested at the time.
Our new Village of Oswego Economic Development Director Vijay Gadde, considers the Lowe’s space a high priority and will continue to work with Lowe’s real estate personnel and market the property to interested retailers.
GailR
4:35 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Michele,
Thanks for chiming in with the facts. I wish Mr Gadde tons of luck; it's a shame to see that space vacant.
Oswego Mom
2:06 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
sounds as though there might be some Jewel space coming available as well ... (just guessing from the news in January) Sad to see all these vacant spots. Are they closing because of economic shrinkage, or closing because Oswego did not sustain the astronomical growth rates expected ?
GailR
4:32 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Jewel in Oswego isn't closing. They've announced one Aurora store and a couple other places.
KarenF
7:35 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
When will we see an update about the meeting on Tuesday regarding Sam's in Montgomery?