patching...
Update: Are you following Montgomery Patch on Facebook? Go here: http://www.facebook.com/montgomerypatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Court Records Cast Further Doubt on Petrella's Residency

A process server noted County Board member Suzanne Petrella's Yorkville home appeared "maintained and unoccupied" in March, well before she said she started moving in October. Petrella says she was preparing for and recovering from surgery in March.

 

A process server’s conclusion that County Board Member Suzanne Petrella’s home was unoccupied in March has strengthened some political opponents’ doubts about her residency and her role in the county board’s redistricting process.

Petrella, who last week was reappointed to her District 1 seat after being removed over her residency, said she was living at her long-time Yorkville home in March while she had surgery that required hospitalization for three or four days. She also sometimes stayed at her boyfriend’s home at 1394 Route 31, Oswego.

Court records show Robert B. Holst, of United Processing Inc., unsuccessfully tried to deliver foreclosure paperwork to Petrella at 14 Maple St. in Yorkville eight times over two weeks in March. He noted stopping by the home as early as 8:45 a.m. and as late as 8:40 p.m. but indicated that no one seemed to have been at the residence between his first visit March 2 and his last March 16.

“The home clearly appears unoccupied,” Holst wrote in a court affidavit. “There is personal property packed in boxes stacked neatly in preparation for moving and no furniture visible.”

His observations came months before Petrella publicly acknowledged moving out of her district beginning in October and months before she voted for a favorable boundary change. The redistricting committee that ultimately would recommend a boundary line change that pushed Petrella’s boyfriend’s home from District 2 into District 1 met – with Petrella in attendance - for the first time March 14. Meeting minutes also show Petrella attended both the county board meetings in March.

Petrella said Holst would not have been able to see her living quarters from the home’s front window. The boxes he saw stacked contained her grown children’s belongings, she said. Both her sons live out-of-state, while her daughter lives in downtown Chicago.

“It was a tough process to leave the home (where) I had raised my children,” Petrella said. “… I insisted they take everything they had so I would not have to do it alone.”

The process server’s log “casts an even longer shadow of doubt on Petrella's residency question,” said Judy Gilmour, who, like Petrella, is seeking a Republican county board seat in District 1. Eight Republicans are seeking five nominations in the March primary; all 10 county board seats are up for election this year.

“This document seems to indicate that board member Petrella's seat was vacant for much longer than she said,” Gilmour said in an e-mail. “The people deserve to know that their representatives on the county board are being honest and forthright in saying the whole truth. This is one more reason why this county board needs new, qualified members who will serve the people with integrity and transparency, and is the reason why I twice offered my services to the Chairman to fill the vacant seat.”

Another Republican candidate in District 1 – Todd Milliron – said he was disappointed Petrella hadn’t been more forthright about her living situation.

“Her lack of candor is disturbing, but what is more troubling is how her charade fashioned the new Kendall County Reapportionment (Redistricting)  Plan and assured  Ms. Petrella’s Rt. 31 address in Oswego Precinct 15 would be so manipulated for her own political and electoral benefit,” Milliron wrote in an e-mail. “It was not something Ms. Petrella could have accomplish alone; she had help and was in cahoots with certain Kendall County Board members who were also complicit in aiding and abetting this very selfish pretense.”

The issue surfaced after Petrella filed nominating petitions seeking re-election that listed 1394 Route 31, Oswego, as her address this winter.

Petrella said she was staying at the address on Route 31 as she moved from her long-term residence at 14 Maple Street, Yorkville, to 4588 Camden Lane, Yorkville—both addresses in District 1. Petrella said she started moving in October but didn’t draw a lease on the Camden Lane unit until State’s Attorney Eric Weis brought the residency issue to her attention.

Petrella has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and stated she lived outside District 1 – the county board district she was elected to represent – for about four weeks. Kendall County voter's registration records showed she registered at the 14 Maple St. address in January 1998, changed her registration to the Route 31 address on Nov. 2, and changed it to the Camden Lane address on Dec. 14.

She has denied any personal motivations in her redistricting votes, emphasizing that the new boundaries followed an overall preference for natural boundaries – in this case, the river.

The county board voted to vacate her seat in December over her residency. Then, county board members voted 5-3 to affirm reappointing her after she showed Chairman John Purcell bills and a driver’s license with a new District 1 address.

Last week, Purcell stood by his decision to reappoint her to the District 1 seat, emphasizing that voters could elect different candidates “if people are disappointed with the performance of county board members.”

Purcell also indicated the affidavit didn’t prove she was living outside District 1 in March or was not living at 14 Maple St. then.

Petrella and Purcell were among the five county board members who voted June 7 in favor of the redistricting plan that shifted the Route 31 address listed on Petrella’s candidate petition from District 2 to District 1.

Voting against that redistricting plan were Bob Davidson, Dan Koukol and Elizabeth Flowers.

Related Topics: John Purcell, Redistricting, and Suzanne Petrella

Citizen for Reform

9:01 am on Monday, February 13, 2012

Pathetic!! But all are going to be sent out on their FAT booties in March! This isn't Mayberry and the PEOPLE aren't as stupid as the County Board thinks we all are!!

Reply

Mike Francis

12:41 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

Thank you to Patch for being the only legitimate news source in the Kendall county area. The Ledger never gets into controversial issues or does any investigative reporting.

First of all, she already admitted to living outside of the District which should have immediately made her ineligible for her position. That was AFTER it was discovered that she had done so. She didn't notify the Board in advance, but rather, was CAUGHT. Where is the States Attorney in all of this?

Secondly, shen then lied about only being out of her house for 4 months while the MLS photos clearly show a vacant house much earlier than that. Are we to believe her of the actual photos showing a vacant house?

Now she is claiming to have been living in a house that a process server stated was vacant. Are we to believe her latest story again, or are we to be reasonable and realize that she is weaving a pattern of lies that just doesn't stop?

Pay close attention to the other Board members who voted to re-instate her and remember that at election time.

The States Attorney needs to investigate this unless he too has political motivations which makes him look past these sorts of things.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Jillian Duchnowski

9:01 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

Amy Cesich, a Democrat running for a District 1 seat, provided this comment: "This is an issue about transparency and communication or lack thereof. We can all empathize with someone going through life changing events, but Suzanne Petrella and the Board leadership needed to put the facts on the table and be accountable to the residents of Kendall County."

Reply

George Jones

9:37 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

I was at all the meetings on redistricting last year and could tell in the first meeting that Petrella didn't give a hoot about adequately representing Kendall County District 1 residents. She cared more about politics than the residents.

Who is her chief backers on all this ... Purcell her reappointed her. He needs to be voted out. And her soul sister Vickery. She needs to be voted out.

If any sensible voter in District 1 takes a look in detail at Petrella they certainly would not vote for Petrella. Early last year she would not even return phone calls or emails.

Petrella is not a reformer ... she's for the status quo and much higher taxes.

Reply

Dock Ellis

12:31 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012

This is a bunch of hoohah over nothing. Who cares? She's probably out of there in November anyway. This is probably orchestrated by that Milliron candidate. I'll take my local paper over this silly blog any day by the way.

Reply

Todd Milliron

10:45 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Mr. Ellis,
A caring citizen expects their elected officials to do the right thing, follow the law, be forthright, not self-serving. Checking more than one news source allows caring citizens to obtain more than one reporter's perspective, at times picking up important additional information left out in the local paper. You are entitled to your opinion about the hoo-hah over nothing, but 3 KCB members did vote against Ms. Petrella's appointment. I have no friends on the KCB, as a Citizen Watchdog I have required them to follow the law and forced them to follow their own auditor’s findings. In doing so, the KCB finally enacted a no alcohol reimbursement policy, has finally started requesting itemized receipts and a culture of sexual harassment at KCSD is under public scrutiny with a new Chief Deputy is in place.

In KCB District One there are 7 Republicans running for 5 KCB seats, so chances are good that Ms. Petrella may retain her seat in Nov. The KC Dems are only fielding one KCB Dist. #1 Candidate. There are NO County, State or Federal Democrat contested (more than one candidate) races within Kendall County Board Dist. #1, so if an engaged voter, independent of ideology really wants to make sure their 5 KCB Dist. # 1 votes do account for making a true decision for selecting good candidates, one logically would pull the Republican Primary ballot where there are 7 candidate choices. This 3-20-2012 Republican Primary will set the table for the next 10 years.

Reply

Leave a comment